Marginalia

AP English essays, graded so you can defend every score.

Marginalia grades against the official College Board rubric and shows its work — every score quotes the exact line that earned it, flags the calls it’s unsure about, and lets you edit before it ever reaches a student.

  • Defensible. Every row cites the verbatim sentence behind the score.
  • Consistent. Each row is graded independently; shaky calls get extra passes.
  • Yours to edit. Adjust any score and approve before sending.
A real AP Lang essay, graded — try the score steppers

AP English Language — Rhetorical Analysis (FRQ 2)

essay · graded by claude-opus-4-8 · 7 passes (up to 3/row where unsure)
6 / 6
suggested score
This essay has rows flagged for your review — the grader wasn’t confident or its passes disagreed. Check those before sending.

Row A — Thesis / Claim

Defensible thesis
high confidencepasses [1]
1/1

States a defensible thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning about the writer's rhetorical choices.

Dr. Elena Marsh argues that curiosity, not certainty, is the engine of a meaningful life
A defensible interpretive claim about the writer's argument — not a restatement of the prompt.
She builds this case through a careful escalation of personal anecdote, pointed rhetorical questions, and a closing metaphor
Previews the line of reasoning the essay will follow, satisfying the band's requirement.

Row B — Evidence & Commentary

Specific evidence + explanatory commentary
medium confidencepasses [3, 4, 4]
4/4

Provides specific evidence for each claim and consistently explains how multiple rhetorical choices (confession, parallel questions, metaphor) contribute to the writer's purpose.

By leading with vulnerability, she disarms a young audience braced for the usual triumphant commencement script.
Explains the rhetorical effect of the opening choice, not just that it occurs.
The parallel structure invites the listener to supply the obvious answer themselves, so that the argument feels discovered rather than delivered.
Ties a specific structural choice to its persuasive function — the hallmark of a 4-point response.

Row C — Sophistication

Demonstrates sophistication
low confidencepasses [1, 1, 0]
1/1

The closing reframing of uncertainty as agency suggests a complex understanding, but the sophistication is concentrated in the final paragraph rather than sustained — a borderline call worth a human check.

she engineers the experience of curiosity in the room, leaving the audience persuaded by a conclusion they feel they reached on their own
Articulates a complex understanding of the rhetorical situation, but appears only at the very end.
  • Grader reported low confidence on the representative pass.
  • Passes disagreed on score (1, 1, 0 pt); using the conservative 1 pt.
all evidence verified against the essay

Built for one rubric, done right.

Not a generic essay grader — the grader built for the AP English rubric. Bring a class set of PDFs, Word docs, or pasted essays and get defensible scores back in minutes.

Start grading free